|
Family farmers denounce bill that will limit local control
(Thursday, April 3, 2003 -- CropChoice news) -- The following is a news release from the Missouri Rural Crisis Center.
Jefferson City, MO —The Missouri House Agriculture Committee is attempting to pass a bill that would take away citizens’ rights to be informed when factory farm operations are coming into their communitiess and would limit counties’ rights to protect citizens from potential negative health impacts of industrial livestock operations. The bill—HB 494—was heard in the House Ag Committee yesterday afternoon.
“This bill is corporate agribusiness’ attempt to stifle public participation in the democratic process, because people have seen the impacts of factory on rural counties and they simply don’t want them in their neighborhoods. It’s nothing more than a back-room strategy for bringing more factory farms to rural Missouri without local governments or individuals even knowing about it,” Missouri Rural Crisis Center Organizing Coordinator, Bryce Oates, told the Ag Committee during a hearing in the Capital yesterday. “It’s ridiculous that Missouri legislators would even think about taking away the democratic rights of local communities to take protect the health and welfare of their people and their environment.”
Numerous other Missouri farmers and rural citizens traveled to Jefferson City yesterday to testify against HB 494. This bill will make two important changes in state laws governing factory farms:
1.) Limits the ability of counties to pass local health ordinances that protect their citizens from public health threats from industrial livestock operations.
Unlike diversified family farms, industrial livestock operations—defined as CAFOs—concentrate hundreds and thousands of animals in confined facilities. This concentrates livestock manure into such a small geographical area that these facilities threaten the air, water and soil in the areas where they operate. Many of the public health impacts have been well-documented and demonstrate that CAFOS are a real public health threat for rural counties (See Attached Fact Sheet).
Livingston County farmer and MRCC President Bill Christison says that the best economic and environmental advantage we can give to rural communities is to support independent family farmers. “Some self-proclaimed leaders of the industry—who do not represent the best interests of family farmers—keep saying that we’ve got to make sure that Missouri is a ‘livestock friendly state.’ What we really need is to make sure that Missouri is a family farm livestock producer friendly state. The leaders of our great state should join together with family farmers to work for fair and competitive markets instead of simply providing political cover for further corporatization and concentration of agriculture.”
“The corporations keep telling us there’s technology to control the odors and diseases, but they cost money, and they’re saving a lot by not building the right environmental safeguards,” Margot McMillen, a Callaway County farmer and MRCC member, told the Ag Committee. “Instead, they’re exporting their costs onto their neighbors in the form of manure spills, fish kills and decreased property values. The best way to protect citizens is through local control of factory farms. This bill disables the rights of local communities to protect themselves, and should be voted down.”
THE FACTS ABOUT FACTORY FARMS
ECONOMIC IMPACTS:
Missouri Rural Crisis Center |